- Ambler SW (2001). The Object Primer: The Application Developer’s Guide to Object Orientation and the UML. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Andujar C, Brunet P (1999). The discretized polyhedra simplification: A framework for polyhedra simplification based on decomposition schemes. Technical Report IRI-DT-99-00, Technical University of Catalonia.Google Scholar
- Andujar C, Brunet P, Ayala D (2002). Tolopogy-reducing surface simplification using a discrete solid representation. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21: 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Apfel RE (1992). Deaf Architects & Blind Acousticians: Challenges to Sound Design. Madison, CT, USA: Printworks.Google Scholar
- Bassuet A, Rife D, Dellatorre L (2014). Computational and optimization design in geometric acoustics. Building Acoustics, 21: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beranek L (1979). Acoustics of concert halls. Acta Acustica, 1979(4): 251–259. (in Chinese)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Beranek L (2004). Concert Halls and Opera Houses. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beranek L (2011). Concert Hall Acoustics. Architectural Science Review, 54: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Booch G, Maksimchuk RA (2007). Object-oriented analysis and design with applications, 3rd edn. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Bork I (2005a). Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation—Part I: Measurements. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 91: 740–752.Google Scholar
- Bork I (2005b). Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation—Part II: Calculations. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 91: 753–763.Google Scholar
- Burry M (2011). Scripting Culture: Architectural Design and Programming. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Cheng Y (2013). Contemporary Buildings for Performing Arts in Multiple Views. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Dalenbäck BI (2012). Introduction Manual of CATT-Acoustic v9.0. Available at http://www.catt.se/CATT-Acoustic.htm. Accessed 15 July 2015.Google Scholar
- Dritsas D, Rafailaki E (2007). A computational framework for theater design. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference of the Arab Society for Computer Aided Architectural Design (ASCAAD 2007), Alexandria, Egypt, pp. 165–182.Google Scholar
- Foged IW, Pasold A, Jensen MB, Poulsen ES (2012). Acoustic environments: Applying evolutionary algorithms for sound based morphogenesis. In: Proceedings of 30th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2012), Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 347–353.Google Scholar
- Janssen P (2004). Design method and computing architecture for generating and evolving building designs. PhD Thesis, Hong Kong Polytech University, Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar
- Kouzeleas S, Semidor C (2002). Architectural translation of the acoustical results. In: Proceedings of International Congress of the Institute of Acoustics 2002, London.Google Scholar
- Lawson B (2005). How Designers Think: The Design Process, 4th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lokki T, Pätynen J, Tervo S, Siltanen S, Savioja L (2011). Engaging concert hall acoustics is made up of temporal envelope preserving reflections. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129: EL223–EL228.Google Scholar
- Mahalingam G (1998). The algorithmic auditorium: A computational model for auditorium design. In: Proceedings of 3rd Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 1998), Osaka, Japan, pp. 143–152.Google Scholar
- Mahalingam G (1999). A new algorithm for the simulation of sound propagation in spatial enclosures. In: Proceedings of 6th IBPSA International Conference (BS1999), Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
- Mahalingam G (2003). Representing architectural design using a connections based paradigm, In: Proceedings of Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA 2003), Indianapolis, USA, pp. 270–277.Google Scholar
- Microsoft (2015a). SendKeys Class Help. Available at https://msdn.microsoft.com/us-en/library/system.windows.forms. sendkeys.aspx. Accessed 15 July 2015.Google Scholar
- Microsoft (2015b). System. Diagnostics Namespaces Help. Available at https://msdn.microsoft.com/us-en/library/gg145030(v=vs.110).aspx. Accessed 15 July 2015.Google Scholar
- Monks M, Oh B, Dorsey J (2000). Audioptimization: Goal-based acoustic design. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20(3): 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pehle M, Marek T (2013). SU2CATT Help. Available at http://www.rahe-kraft.de/rk/en/software/su2catt. Accessed 15 July 2015.Google Scholar
- Peters B (2010). Acoustic performance as a design driver: Sound simulation and parametric modeling using smart geometry. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 8: 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rindel JH (2000). The use of computer modeling in room acoustics. Journal of Vibroengineering, 3(4): 220–224.Google Scholar
- Robinson P, Siltanen S, Lokki T, Savioja L (2014). Concert hall geometry optimization with parametric modeling tools and wave-based acoustic simulations. Building Acoustics, 21: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saksela K, Botts J, Savioja L (2015). Optimization of absorption placement using geometrical acoustic models and least squares. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137: 274–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Siltanen S, Lokki T, Savioja L, Lynge C (2008). Geometry reduction in room acoustics modeling. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 94: 410–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spaeth B, Menges A (2010). Performative design for spatial acoustic: Concept for an evolutionary design algorithm based on acoustics as design driver, In: Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2010), Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 461–468.Google Scholar
- Szalapaj P (2005). Contemporary Architecture and the Digital Design Process. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
- Vorländer M (1995). International round robin on room acoustical computer simulations. In: Proceedings of 15th International Congress on Acoustics, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 689–692.Google Scholar
- Wei L, Zhang Q, Xu Z, Zhang X (2012). Coming out of the misunderstandings of digital design technologies. Architectural Journal, 2012(9): 1–6. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Xu S (2011a). A design study of auditoriums based on CAAD. Master Thesis, Tsinghua University, China. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Xu W (2011b). Parametric design and form generating with algorithms. World Architecture, 2011(6): 110–111. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
![Rhino Rhino](/uploads/1/2/4/7/124794771/353957693.jpg)
CATT-Acoustic v9.0 Demo library files is composed of the following executables which take 667.84 KB (683865 bytes) on disk: unins000.exe (667.84 KB) The information on this page is only about version 9.0 of CATT-Acoustic v9.0 Demo library files. A way to remove CATT-Acoustic v9.0 Demo library files from your PC with Advanced Uninstaller PRO.